Understanding database  : Hash based indexes
Understanding database 7 : Hash based indexes
When we are to implement hash based indexes, it is key that we should partition our data into buckets. As for the rule to allocate entries, we use each entry’s search key as its bucket id to partition, where each bucket will hold entries that share a same property.
In order to determine what is that property we have chosen to partition with, we will have to introduce a hash function h(v), where v ranges over all the search key values. We will consider each bucket as a unit of storage containing one or more records that is stored in a page. It is often considered better to use hash based indexes for equality searches, and it is unable to support range searches due to the use of buckets.
The steps of a equality search with hash index is as below :
1. Given v value, compute with h(v) = a
2. Retrieve the bucket a
3. Search the wanted entry from the bucket
As we may see from above, the cost of searching is equivalent to the number of pages in the bucket, which is superior compared to B+ trees (if no overflow chains).
One variety of hashing that is often used is the static hashing method. The bucket allocation is based on a modulo value that is equivalent to the number of buckets existing primarily. The id of the bucket is being retrieved via h(k) % m, where m is the number of buckets existing. The number of pages are fixed, and are never deallocated by any chance and are sequentially allocated. As a result of the fixed number of pages, overflow pages may be needed for entries outside the capacity, and this may pull the efficiency down.
Extendible hashing is another variety which deals with the excessive overflowing chains that may occur. Each time when we have full pages, we will double the number of buckets by 2, and reallocate the entries based on their hashes. We will need a ‘global depth’ variable to indicate the number of bits that we will need to get from the hash function.
For example, when we have a hashed result of binary encoding 101, where our global depth is 2, we will take the last 2 bits 01 as the bucket id and will not look at the entire 101 (at least for this global depth). Each bucket will also have a local depth which denotes the number of bits it uses to identify itself from others. The splitting of buckets will occur when the local depth is larger than the global depth, then the directory size (indicator of number of buckets) will be doubled and the entries will be redistributed with the corresponding number of bits needed.
It is worth noting that if the distribution of hash value are skew, the directory may end up growing pretty large, and if the directory fits in the memory, equality searches may be answered with 1, or else 2 disk accesses.
For deletion in extendible hashing, if the removal of a data entry results in a empty bucket, it can be merged its split image. If we have each directory element pointing to its split image, we can reduce the directory to half.
Post a Comment